<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Philip Yurchuk &#187; jvm languages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philip.yurchuk.com/tag/jvm-languages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philip.yurchuk.com</link>
	<description>Software Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:32:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>JVM Language Shootout</title>
		<link>http://philip.yurchuk.com/2006/08/13/jvm-language-shootout/</link>
		<comments>http://philip.yurchuk.com/2006/08/13/jvm-language-shootout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 07:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Philip Yurchuk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jvm languages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philip.yurchuk.com/2006/08/13/jvm-language-shootout/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Yegge has a comparison of various languages for the JVM. For the comparison, he creates an actual Swing application, so if the language couldn&#8217;t handle that, it didn&#8217;t get included. Since the objective was to find a language capable of replacing Java on the JVM, it&#8217;s a reasonable criterion. He&#8217;s not finished, but he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/">Steve Yegge</a> has a <a href="http://www.cabochon.com/~stevey/sokoban/">comparison of various languages for the JVM</a>. For the comparison, he creates an actual Swing application, so if the language couldn&#8217;t handle that, it didn&#8217;t get included. Since the objective was to find a language capable of replacing Java on the JVM, it&#8217;s a reasonable criterion. He&#8217;s not finished, but he goes into depth on languages he does cover. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m not the only one anxious to hear his opinion of JRuby. Whatever he writes about it, though, couldn&#8217;t be worse than his <a href="http://www.cabochon.com/~stevey/sokoban/docs/article-groovy.html">damning review of Groovy</a>.</p>
<p>To give you a taste of Steve&#8217;s writing style, here&#8217;s something from his Java wishlist (yes, Java 5 was included in the shootout):</p>
<blockquote><p>#2: Bean shortcuts &#8212; C&#8217;mon, Sun folks. It&#8217;s practically the first thing people change about Java when they write a JVM language (or even an interpreter like BeanShell). Even small children can tell you that accessing a property using field-access syntax beats calling a getter or setter method. The only possible explanation for why Sun hasn&#8217;t added this yet is that they hate us.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philip.yurchuk.com/2006/08/13/jvm-language-shootout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
